This is the simplest, easiest, and most problematic way of looking at Christian unity and diversity. We're all playing, but usually against each other. |
Following up further on Dr. Jared Champion’s first post in
his new blog (you can find it here),
I want to explore his perception (which I share) that the Evangelicals he
refers to as “mainstream Christianity” exhibit a “message of anger,
intolerance, and fear,” in contrast to progressive Christians’ “patient grace,
unwavering love, and critical engagement.” As a doctoral student in
Cross-Cultural Engagement, I might object slightly to the mutual exclusivity of
the dichotomy he poses. But I am too much in agreement to do so. Additionally,
I recognize too much of one and too little of the other in myself.
In my confrontation of the anger, intolerance and fear too
prevalent among Christians, I grow impatient and can fail to be gracious toward
my fellow Evangelicals. My love does waver
when I must wearily persist in pointing to Jesus’ pairing of both the great
commandment (i.e., love for God and love for others is stated as a single commandment – Matthew 22:36-40 – “the second
is like it,” in the sense of being of
the same character and substance as the first) and the great commission (Matthew
28:18-20 – in which the result is to be that others follow that single
commandment).
Here is what Christianity begins to look like when we begin to recognize the diversity of backgrounds, traditions, dogma and ritual among our brothers and sisters. |
As much as I want to critically engage anti-intellectual
demagogues among my own tribe (I am
an Evangelical, after all), I can barely pretend to tolerate the proof-texting
and cherry-picking and socio-economic, cultural, and political filtering of
scripture by those who seek justification for the oppression and exploitation
of other human persons (not to mention the rest of God’s creation). Further, I
do fear that we, meaning mainstream, Evangelical Christians, often obscure the
message of Jesus, whether in passages anticipating the Messiah yet to come (the
Old Testament), or the Messiah who came (as told in the New Testament).
The message of Jesus—this gospel, the good news—was first
proclaimed, according to Genesis 3, in the Garden of Eden, and is the
consistent message of scripture up to and including the final judgments and
eternal state described in the last chapters of Revelation. My anger,
intolerance and fear, then, are directed primarily at those who claim to be
Bible teachers who teach only “how the Bible supports our beliefs.”
To me, this is the primary reason I have such difficulty in accepting the diversity among Christians, even as I claim to seek unity among the congregations and denominations in the body of Christ. |
I may be projecting my own perspective onto Dr. Champion’s
thoughts. But I see him offering a confrontation of both progressive and
Evangelical Christians regarding one of very few issues in which they would
agree. My experience is that both progressive and fundamentalist Christians
discourage a robust engagement with the text of the Holy Bible. For
progressives, the fear seems to be that we will emulate parts of the scripture
that are extraneous, or even contradictory to what we perceive to be the core
message of Jesus. For fundamentalists, the fear seems to be that we will
emulate parts of the core message of Jesus that, in their theology, are only
applicable when fulfilled after the end of history.
Progressives seem afraid to find that the scriptures are
more complex than we’d prefer. This would suggest that we are responsible for
more than simply loving others in whatever way we choose to define love, refusing
to acknowledge that our definition of love is often limited in service of our
own selfishness, given our fallen human nature. In contrast, Fundamentalists seem
afraid that we’ll find the scriptures are more comprehensive than the
proof-text memorizations that support “what we all know the Bible says.” Were
we to acknowledge that God’s love applies more broadly than we allow, our
redaction of the text, omitting so much that disagrees with our preconceptions,
would confront the service of our selfishness as well.
Multiply the complexity of this image by something like BILLIONS of times, and you might have some parallel to how God sees The Church. |
The solution for both camps: study the scriptures,
acknowledge the fullness of Jesus’ message, and recognize our reluctance to
either narrow our focus or broaden our love as rooted in our own
self-protection, self-provision, and self-ishness—all of which stem from a lack
of trust in the benevolence of God’s sovereign justice, mercy, and grace.
But returning to answer Dr. Champion’s primary concern, the public
relations crisis facing Jesus’ followers (whatever banner they may camp under),
I would suggest that popularity has never been Jesus’ concern. Still, though,
when the public relations crisis results from misrepresenting the good news He
lived and died and rose again to bring us…that
is what we should work toward fixing!
No comments:
Post a Comment