The fundamental intractability of the Arab-Israeli conflict (from the inception of a people identified as "Ones who struggle with God" - the literal translation of the word Israel) stems from the same struggle we each face whenever we distinguish “me” from “you,” and “us” from “them.” For Israel, the importance of these distinctions is heightened due to Jews being defined as "other than" all other peoples. They are historically "the chosen people," set apart by God, for God. While the idea of struggling "with God" stems from the Patriarch Jacob's literal wrestling match, refusing to let go of God until he received a blessing, there is also the sense that Israel struggles "with God" as His ally, seeking to pass along His blessings to (and/or impose His will on) all other peoples, including the Arabs who "occupied our land" for 1,878 tears (70 CE until 1948).
It
is this "set-apart-ness" that many Europeans found objectionable
during the 19th century as nations began to differentiate from one another by
certain commonalities within distinct geographic borders. In short, those who
lived in Germany were Germans, those who lived in France were French, those who
lived in Spain were Spanish, but the descendants of Israel ("sons of
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob")--no matter WHERE they lived--were all one with
one another as Jews (short for followers of Judaism or, formerly, inhabitants
of Judah--one of the twelve tribes of "The Hebrews").
Persecution against Jews in Europe arose as nationalists reacted to "The Jewish
Problem in Europe." In the 1930s, under Hitler's Nazi regime in Germany,
most of Europe—with support from North Americans—agreed on "The Final
Solution to the Jewish Problem in Europe." But the solution proposed was
not Zionism, the emigration of Jews to a new nation-state of Israel to be located
in Palestine. The solution implemented by Nazi Germany was extermination—the
attempted murder of every Jew in all of Europe, with roughly six million Jews
dying as a result.
With
that as background, the Zionist argument seems reasonable. "Yes, it is
VERY inconvenient for the Palestinians to be expatriated from their homes and
forced to live elsewhere. But the alternative, when we Jews lived elsewhere,
was for others to exterminate us, and leave us with nowhere to live anywhere."
Subsequently, though, most Palestinians have come to find the Israeli position
sounding something like, "You're in our way, you Palestinians. So we will herd
you into settlements, starve you, and occasionally kill some of you, so that we
feel safer from all those others who are still trying to exterminate us."
Ironically,
the underlying belief motivating much of Israel’s Palestinian policy, that “in
this place there can only be ‘us’ and none of ‘them,” is the same underlying
belief that caused the 19th Century European Nation-States to
identify all Jews everywhere as a “them” that needed to be separated or
eradicated from among “us.” Even more difficultly, it is the same underlying
belief that infects all humans everywhere: “We are other than, different
than, and therefore more important than them.” The disease stems from the
third chapter of Genesis, in which we determined that “I am other than,
different than, and therefore more important than you.” So, if you
or they are in the way, we conclude that I and we have the
right to identify and implement a solution to that problem…unless we find the
commonality of us all being “we.” Could that possibly result from our common condition and mutual
acceptance of our fearful tendency to war against the “them?”
No comments:
Post a Comment