July 31, 2014 - ca. 8:30-9:00 p.m. - Fall River Mills, CA |
First,
though, I need to tell you why this comes to mind at the moment. As you
probably know, I live in the Intermountain Area of Northern California. We’re
in the news at the moment. State of Emergency,
mandatory evacuations, and the destruction of homes and businesses by the
combination of three wildfires surrounding the Fall River Valley.
To the south and southeast, the community of Little Valley is under evacuation
order for the Bald Fire. To the northeast, Lookout is being evacuated due to
the 3-7/Day Fire. And to the southwest of us, the Eiler Fire has forced the
evacuation of Johnson
Park, and is threatening
the 3500 residents of Burney.
All four photos from back deck of my home. |
What’s
most interesting to me is a conversation arising repeatedly in the midst of
concerns for packing family photos and heirlooms, planning escape routes around
the road closures, offering housing to the displaced, and causing traffic
hazards by watching the fires, trucks, airplanes, helicopters, and other
unusual sights instead of the road. In the midst of all this, most of us find
time to discuss underbrush.
Specifically, its presence, absence, and/or relative density.
Why
is underbrush so important to us up here? As it’s been explained to me by
people who not only majored in Forestry, but have practiced the art for most of
their adult lives, it’s underbrush that turns a routine, manageable forest fire
into the explosive monster that is described in the U.S. Forest Service’s
incident reports as running and torching, with long range spotting, rapid rates
of spread, and showing “resistance to control (that) is very high” due to
“unstable, old decadent brush.”
These are of the "Bald Fire." |
Forest
fires have occurred for as long as there have been forests and lightning. When
they occur naturally, I’ve been told, they keep the underbrush burned out, only
rarely topping into the trees because of the limited temperature and duration
of the relatively low level of fuel on the forest floor. Why, then, are we
seeing the kinds of wildfires we are experiencing, three-at-a-time, in what
should be some of the best-managed forests in North
America? “Over a hundred years of fire suppression,” was the
answer I got. The build-up of underbrush allows the fire to burn hot enough,
long enough that it becomes the beast exhibiting “extreme fire behavior” that
was described earlier as “exploding” and continuing to “burn in all
directions.”
My
understanding of Fire Science is minimal. I’m sure some feel that excessive
underbrush has little or nothing to do with our current troubles. Certainly, if
it was an issue, some would assume, then it would have been addressed long
before the destruction of so many homes, businesses, and communities. Maybe so.
Probably not. Why am I so doubtful?
Because
my understanding of Church is not minimal. And there, excessive
underbrush, the continued build-up of dangerously volatile issues, continually collecting
while we “put out fires,” making sure that there is hardly ever any open
conflict among us…until something touches off the wildfire, the church-fight,
the church-split, and (between some congregations/denominations/traditions, we
should just as well admit it) church-wars.
The other two fires are the "Eiler" and "Day 3-7" fires. |
Our
conflict-avoidant behavior requires us to treat minor annoyances, petty
squabbles, and most other disputes with analgesics—pain killers. We “agree to
disagree.” We “forgive and forget.” We “let bygones be bygones,” and “bury the
hatchet.” We pretend that the conflict is resolved, when all we’ve really done
is refuse to face, focus, and fix the conflict.
When
we pretend that “little fires” can be put out so easily, we often leave those
who have hurt and/or been hurt by them to smolder.
Even where the flare-ups are extinguished entirely, though, we simply leave the
fuel to build up, until something else ignites in close enough proximity that
it all goes up together.
What
can we do instead? The pattern I’ve discovered isn’t a new one. It’s twenty
centuries old. Jesus gave it to us in Matthew
18:15-18. But because it is so rarely practiced, it
only gets tried when the stakes, and the flames, are already at their most
extreme.
As
an alternative, try facing the conflicts, even the littlest ones. Build the
relationships among us by focusing clearly on where we disagree. And fix any
damage to the solidarity in our families, to our oneness as members of Christ’s
body (the Church), and to our mutual interests as a community, by realizing
that we may not entirely reconcile our diverse viewpoints, but that in dialogue
with one another we can reconcile our
relationships together.
3 comments:
Love it Bill! We don't take the time and emotional energy to work through where we disagree. We either walk away from difficult relationships or we sweep stuff under the rug until low-level issues too easily jump into the canopy by the smallest spark of a misspoken word (James 3:5-6).
The other contributing factor, as you know, is drought. Little issues can easily become big issues when we are not planted by rivers of water (Psalm 1:3) and thirsting for the presence of the Lord each day and like the deer coming morning and evening to drink deeply of Word and Spirit that we might not fail to love well.
Great pictures as well! Be safe!
Bill those photos from the deck of your house are frightening and staggering! Today I drove by three fires like that in my state. It took over three hours to drive past them at 70 mph. One of the fires has burned 400 square miles and 300 homes so far. The difference was that I could drive away and be left with only the smoke cloud surrounding my house, close to two hundred miles away, while your house is actually in dire danger of being burned, as so many of the neighbors you care about have had. I think some of the things you are writing about may be questions such as, "With all that is dear at stake, are we sure that church wars are worth fighting?" and "Can perhaps unity come at a price short of losing all?" jp
Thanks for the comments! We are relatively safe here in Fall River Mills. But the drought and threat of thunderstorms continues, of course. Still, we're very thankful to have a few means of helping out, and supporting both the local residents and our very welcome thousands of guests working intently to save as many homes and communities as possible. Greg, you make a good point about the drought, too. And, JP, once things get to the point of church-wars, I think we're all better off to admit defeat, and start over by demolishing our own heavily fortified boundaries.
Post a Comment