In
his post, “Producers, Consumers, and Communers,” (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/uncommongodcommongood/2014/01/producers-consumers-and-communers/)
Paul Louis Metzger refers to “a
noted pastor (who) has called on men to be real men by moving from being
consumers to being producers.” Dr. Metzger then offers a third option, one that
I believe is soundly based on the nature of human beings.
As
I understand scripture, we are created to bear the image and likeness of the
one God, eternally existing in three persons. We are designed to be relational,
communicating with one another in authenticity and transparency. Anyone who’s
tried this, however, know that it results in far more vulnerability than most
of us would prefer. Still, trusting in the God who created us, many of us persevere
in seeking to establish, maintain, enhance and, when necessary, restore and
reconcile our relationships with one another.
From
a similar perspective, Dr. Metzger labels his third option, “Communers.”
I
would note, though, that the “noted pastor” noted above does, at least, offer
an improvement over the approach too many others still take. Where human beings
are considered as producers and consumers, there is still a sense that both
categories describe persons in relation to one another. Sadly, the
church has lost that simple focus at the level of local leadership, and in the
corporate competition of divisive denominationalism.
In
21st Century North American Christianity, our most common leadership
structures replace pastoral practitioners (e.g., the four offices serving the
purposes of Ephesians
4:11-16) with entrepreneurs, chief-operating-officers, and
staff-management specialists. This shift is driven
(to quote another noted pastor) by similarly replacing persons (whether considered parishioners, congregants, members of
Christ’s body, or some other term) with statistics.
We still speak about the importance of caring for and cooperating with God’s
people, joining in unified service to Christ and others. But for those
activities there is no blank to fill-in, nor box to check-off on the parent
corporation’s monthly, quarterly, and annual reports. Where the church’s local
leaders and denominational directors are producers or consumers or both, we don’t
even turn persons into our primary product any more. People a merely a commodity that we integrate as components of our conglomerates’
machinery.
And
yes, I do mean our product and our conglomerates. In a subsequent post,
I will explain my complicity in having damaged my family, parishioners,
congregations, and denomination. But for now, I want to stay on-topic about the
need to repent and refocus our ministry priorities in order to bring health and
strength, and perhaps even some unity to the body of Christ.
Dr.
Metzger’s concern about “a bifurcation of humanity” (splitting us from being “one
another” into two groups: producers and consumers) is well-founded. But the
underlying cause, in my experience, is the constant re-infection of
individuals, families, and congregations by those whom they call “pastors.”
Among local congregations, aspiring program directors and public speakers,
especially those with appealing personalities, have an incredible depth and
breadth of management and marketing resources available to them. These methods
and machinery are often effective in improving the attendance and fiscal
capabilities of their religious organizations. But I don’t see much to suggest
that these enterprising employees are pastors.
And I’m not sure that the crowd that gathers around them can legitimately be
called “a church.”
Unity
in the body of Christ, and any community among persons in general, must begin
with accepting the basic premise: It is persons,
not products to whom, with whom, for
whom, and (considering our position before God through Christ) in whom we live, serve, and love.
No comments:
Post a Comment