Sin is anaerobic. Exposed, it
can be treated. In fact, it usually starves. Concealed, however, it grows and
deepens, eating away whatever it has found that is willing to host it.
That said, I am often
arrogant, judgmental, quick to criticize without seeking to understand
another's position, and guilty of using big words in order to silence potential
objections to my own positions. There's more to that list, but in this context,
those are the most germane. (See, there's that vocabulary thing again.)
Still, there are sins that
are evident to me precisely because of my own struggles with them. And there
are others that become obvious due to the pain they cause others. Most of those
I recognize, however, are the ones that harm, threaten, or even simply annoy
me.
As is often noted, Christians
are not perfect. But we are not “just forgiven.” When confronted with our sins,
we are repentant; we confess; and we seek restoration through forgiveness. We
sometimes are woefully ignorant of the harm caused by our attitudes and
actions, until someone loves us enough to point them out. Our reaction to that
revelation of our imperfections, misunderstandings, and/or unfortunate choices
(and especially our willful sins) depends in large part upon our willingness to
trust Christ to bring a greater level of maturity to our dependence upon His righteousness, as opposed to
defending our own self-righteousness.
Here’s a brief case-study
that you may already have been forced to consider by some of your Facebook
friends.
Yesterday, a Facebook post by
Pastor Rick Warren ignited significant criticism from Chinese believers and
church leaders. It also resulted in almost universal support (3,955 “likes” as
of 4:00 a.m. today) from non-Chinese, primarily Anglo “followers” of Pastor
Warren. (For those outside the confines of Evangelical culture, Pastor Warren
is famous as the founder of Saddleback Community Church, a mega-church
originally programmed on the basis of then-innovative market-research into the
“felt needs” of “Saddleback Sam…married to Samantha, and…two kids, Steve and
Sally.”)
Using the confident, can-do
attitude embodied by a young woman’s posterized image as his icon, Pastor
Warren posted: “The typical attitude of Saddleback Staff as they start work
each day.” A very clever, even cute comment, evidently intended to encourage a
sense of comrade-ry…which is ironic since the young woman depicted actually is
a “comrade,” wearing the uniform and armband of Communist China’s Red Guard. For
a clearer understanding of how offensive this image is, I would refer you first
to Dr. Sam Tsang’s post, at “Rick
Warren, Cultural Sensitivity, and Mission,”
http://engagethepews.wordpress.com/2013/09/23/rick-warren-cultural-sensitivity-and-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-283.
What concerns me in the
context of conflict resolution and relational reconciliation (the goals of the
protocol that Jesus gives us in Matthew 18:15-18) is the response Pastor
Warren offers to those shocked by his insensitivity (perhaps initially through
simple ignorance) regarding the image’s impact on so many. He wrote, “People
often miss irony on the Internet. It's a joke people! If you take this
seriously, you really shouldn't be following me! Did you know that, using
Hebrew ironic humor, Jesus inserted several laugh lines- jokes - in the Sermon
on the Mount? The self-righteous missed them all while the disciples were
undoubtedly giggling!”
If I may, let me suggest to
the nearly 4000 who “like” the inflammatory post that they should take this seriously, and really shouldn’t be following Pastor Warren. (Even if repentance,
confession, and forgiveness result in restoration—follow Jesus instead, okay?)
If the point is still lost on those who have little or no sense of Chinese
history, perhaps we might recognize that the following Hebrew irony should be
just as unthinkable.
If this were hanging on
Saddleback’s walls,
would we then be “undoubtedly giggling?”
6 comments:
I want to add that Dr. Tsang has noted that Pastor Warren has apologized (3:05 p.m. PDT today) and that he has accepted. 'Nough said. (Except to remark how remarkable it is, and how sad it is that repentance is remarkable.)
That was no apology. That was a thank you for teaching me. An apology is, I'm sorry. Please forgive me for offending you.
Where Dr. Tsang mentioned the apology there is a broken link that I assumed should have taken the reader to Pastor Warren's apology. If by "apology," Dr. Tsang means the comment Pastor Warren made to his blog, I would certainly agree. Repenting and misrepresenting the facts (regarding the "instant" removal of the offending post--it was there long enough to garner 4000 "likes" and over 300 comments, and long after those comments included careful explanations of the nature of the offense) hardly go hand-in-hand. I am assuming that there was some other communication to Dr. Tsang than the comment, which reads: "Thanks so much for teaching us! It was removed instantly. May God bless you richly. Anytime you have guidance, you (or anyone else) can email me directly, PastorRick@saddleback.com.
May the grace of Jesus be your experience today. Thanks again! Your servant, Rick Warren.
P.S. In 1979, Kay and I felt called of God to serve in China but we were prevented by the government at that time. I had already been a part of planting a church near Nagasaki, Japan where I lived in 1974. When our plans were blocked, we ended up planting Saddleback in California."
Additionally, I have asked Dr. Tsang to clarify whether there is, in fact, some other communication to which he was referring. I'll be sure to post here whatever reply is received. Thanks for commenting.
I agree, that's not an apology, it's thank you for teaching us, not me, us.
According to Religion News Service, "Among several posts Wednesday evening, Warren posted the following on Facebook:
'Finally back home. Staff handed me a hard copy of an email from someone offended by a picture I posted. If you were hurt, upset, offended, or distressed by my insensitivity I am truly sorry. May God richly bless you.'"
Note that he owns up to "my insensitivity" and expresses "I am truly sorry." I'm okay with calling that an apology.
Post a Comment